Archive for November 2007
Thórarinn Ingi Jónsson, an Icelandic student at Toronto’s Ontario College of Art and Design, has recently managed to get himself into quite a bit of trouble thanks to an “art project” that went horribly wrong, as Iceland Review explains.
Icelandic art student Thórarinn Ingi Jónsson caused quite a fuss in downtown Toronto this week when he left a phony bomb in an art gallery as part of an art project. The gallery was cleared and police closed streets in the city center.
“I created a sculpture from wood and paint that looked like a bomb at first glance. I then recorded two videos on a cell phone that show a blast,” Jónsson, who is studying at the Ontario College of Art and Design in Toronto, told Fréttabladid.
“The day I was supposed to show my final project I went to the gallery and placed the sculpture next to a bench with a note saying it wasn’t a bomb,” Jónsson continued. Then he went back to his class to show his artwork and only found out later how much trouble it had caused.
“I haven’t heard from the police but I spoke to the college’s lawyer before I started making the artwork,” Jónsson said, adding the Canadian media has been rather negative towards his work, saying it can hardly be categorized as art.
Jónsson is not bothered by the negative coverage. He explained his work was inspired by Marcel Duchamp who placed a toilet in an art gallery. Jónsson said his work is also a reference to modern times.
“This wouldn’t have been such a big deal before September 11, 2001. Everything has changed since then. The timing of the work is therefore important,” Jónsson concluded.
In an interview with Torontoist, Jónsson further explained his actions.
Yesterday at about 4 p.m., Jonsson walked into the ROM with the fake bomb inside a bag. Attached to the bomb was a note that read “This is not a bomb.” Jonsson thought that the note meant he wasn’t breaking the law: he had been advised by an OCAD Student Union lawyer before installing the piece, he says, against spreading false news, and told that he should not attempt to deceive people about the bomb’s legitimacy. (That’s why, for instance, one of the descriptions for the videos he later uploaded read: “Fake footage of the fake bombing at the Royal Ontario Museum capturing the fake moment of impact.”) Though Jonsson intended to leave the pipe bomb outside of the bag out in the open in a “noticeable spot,” “almost like a presentation,” he says there were “too many people around,” and he decided to keep the sculpture inside the bag, placing it on the right-hand side of the ROM’s Bloor Street entrance with the declarative note visible on top.
“I went a bit down the street, as soon as I came out of the gathering,” he told us, “and I dialed up the ROM and they asked for an extension and I hadn’t really thought that far, so I typed in some random last name and I ended up reaching some girl at some office at the ROM and I simply told her: ‘Listen there’s no bomb by the entrance to the museum,’ and then I hung up.”
Jonsson went straight from the ROM back to school for 5 p.m. to give his presentation of his final piece, where he “revealed the extent of the project.” People in his class, he says “were really impressed with the extent I went to.” Worried that there was a possibility of legal action, he hadn’t told his professors about the piece until the night it was installed.
When Jonsson got back home, he uploaded the videos he’d recorded earlier that day to YouTube (to an account that featured other videos––like the one of Osama Bin Laden on the roof of the World Trace Center watching as hearts pour out of the building and Bob Dylan’s “The Man In Me” plays––that Jonsson says are “completely unrelated”). Then, he e-mailed the addresses of them to several news organizations.
“I didn’t really expect it go so crazy.”
Unfortunately for him, quite apart from forcing the cancellation of a CanFAR AIDS fundraiser that was being held at the Royal Ontario Museum that night, it looks like he has indeed managed to get himself into quite a bit of trouble.
Jonsson, a third-year student at the Ontario College of Art and Design, was released after $33,000 was posted as a cash bond by three separate sureties. Jonsson is an Icelandic citizen and must surrender his passport to police within 24 hours of his release and reside with one of the sureties, who is a clinical psychologist and friend of the family living in downtown Toronto.
[. . .]
Toronto Police Det. Leslie Dunkley said the criminal charges Jonsson faces could land him up to four years in prison, if he’s convicted.
“It’s a very serious offence,” Dunkley said. “We take it seriously and we don’t want to encourage it.”
The judge imposed a publication ban on evidence presented at the bail hearing Friday morning.
As part of his conditions of release, Jonsson must also stay away from the ROM property, he cannot possess any explosive devices or imitations of explosive devices, he cannot possess illegal weapons and he must go to counselling as directed by his surety. One of the sureties, the wife of a retired Honorary Council of Iceland, posted $25,000 of the total.
The very best that can be said for Jónsson is that at least he wasn’t into the sort of performance art that involved joking to airport security in the United States about his shoe bombs, and that Canada lacks a Guantanamo. (I’m honestly just a bit unsure as to whether the last might be a bad thing in this case.)
Light flakes of snow, falling slowly, greeted me as I left my apartment. I understand that the snowfall was heavier later in the afternoon, but I think that the snow has stopped and suspect that, unlike last week’s dusting, this snowfall might stay. It looks like my part of the northern hemisphere is finally on the wrong side of the solar system’s snow line again.
The ongoing international drama about British teacher Gillian Gibbons, arrested in Sudan after she let her pupils give a class teddy bear the name “Muhammad,” began innocently enough.
Gibbons, who joined Unity in August, asked the class of mostly seven-year-olds to name the toy.
“They came up with eight names including Abdullah, Hassan and Muhammad. Then she explained what it meant to vote and asked them to choose the name.” Twenty out of the 23 children chose Muhammad.
Each child was allowed to take the bear home at weekends and was told to write a diary about what he or she did with the toy. The entries were collected in a book with a picture of the bear on the cover, next to the message “My name is Muhammad,” said Boulos.
Boulos said the first he knew about the course was last week when he received a phone call from the ministry of education, saying a number of Muslim parents had made formal complaints.
A spokesman for the British embassy in Khartoum said it was still unclear whether Gibbons had been formally charged. “We are following it up with the authorities and trying to meet her in person,” he said.
Boulos said he had decided to close down the school until January for fear of reprisals in Sudan’s predominantly Muslim capital. “This is a very sensitive issue,” he said.
“We are very worried about her safety,” he added. “This was a completely innocent mistake. Miss Gibbons would have never wanted to insult Islam.”
Unity, an independent school founded in 1902, is governed by a board representing the main Christian denominations in Sudan but teaches both Christians and Muslims aged four to 18.
It has managed to escalate quite significantly since then, as a cursory scan of news sources (1, 2, 3) shows. It’s well-known that names have power, but as Christopher House points out in his blog at The Telegraph, the different language communities around the world have different taboos around naming–the personal Jesus might well seem odd in the Anglophone world, perhaps like Chris in the Hispanophone world.
Even so, the scale of the reaction seems odd–it’s hard to imagine how a teddy bear named by children could cause such a level of offense. How could this happen? Jon Brown at the Liverpool Echo explains much of this in the context of the politicized nature of religion in Sudanese society..
[R]eligion is a battleground in Sudan.
It is the fuel that sustained a long-running civil war between the ruling Muslim Arab elite in the north and the largely Christian African rebels of the south. It can also be a flag of convenience for those seeking advantage over political or tribal foes.
So perceived insults to the faith and the Prophet Mohammed can be exploited as weapons in the always-simmering cauldron of Sudanese politics, while religious fervour may be brandished as a symbol of political allegiance as well as one of faith.
Gillian Gibbons’ only error, I suspect, was to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and to be caught up in a wider, more dangerous game of jockeying for power.
That’s not to say that there wouldn’t have been Muslims genuinely offended by her actions.
But nothing in Sudan is ever quite what it seems.
I think that Brown’s explanation can be extended further, to a global scale, to explain the divide that seems to be emerging between the self-identified West and the self-identified Islamic world. We can have grand civilizational clashes of in true Huntingtonian style, but we can have them only if we want to. Little things, sufficiently magnified out of proportion by political authorities and media alike, can help create the preconditions for a much broader confrontation. After all, in Yugoslavia, all that it took was one soccer riot in Zagreb to push Serbia and Croatia towards war one year later. What will happen to Gibbons? And what will happen after her?
In the meantime, the reaction from the Sudanese themselves to this, the latest of their government’s many missteps, seems to be that the government has wildly overreacted to a simple mistake by someone unfamiliar with Sudanese culture. One can only hope that the comment made by a Sudanese commenter at a pro-Gibbons Facebook group will be taken as the final word by all this.
“The worst part, by far, is that neither we nor the media are able to shrug this off for the foolishness that it is and insist on making a mountain out of a molehill,” posts Hatim Yahia.
“Let’s see, on the one hand we have global warming, continuing poverty, HIV, famine, war and generally death in all forms, but no we’d rather talk about this lunacy instead.
Once, someone at the group blog Postive Liberty–I think it was Jason Kuznicki–wrote about the problems associated with the involvement of foreigners in American domestic politics, this involvement being motivated by the United States’ extensive if n ot overwhelming presence in so much of the wider world. Sometimes this involvement can produce disastrous consequences, as the possibly disastrous effect of The Guardian‘s anti-Bush campaign in Ohio shows. The only thing that I qualified in saying–indeed, safe in saying–is that future American administrations should have as little influence from
post-Trotskyites neoconservatives as possible. (Hail President Clinton?)
The below fan remix video of Canadian indie rock band Metric‘s single “Dead Disco” appeals to me, not only for the faintly mournful yet danceable musical Kylie Kills remix but because the video’s creator managed to match the song up with a Finnish disco dancing instructional video quite effectively.
I don’t know for certain what the song is actually about–“Dead Disco”‘s lyrics are, like most Metric lyrics somewhat cryptic–but I’m guessing it’s about resignation to the impossibility of radical change or innovation in a world where everything has been done.
Skip town. slow down
Push it to the east coast
Step down turn around
Push it to the west
Need less, use less
We’re asking for too much I guess
Cause all we get is…
Dead rock and roll
Everything has been done
La la la la la la la la la la
Granted that the lyrics are kind of depressing, they don’t interfere with the music of with this remix (and the original song, of course). I can easily imagine it to be a good come-down song, the sort that a DJ might play at teh end of a set when the club’s about to close down and everyone’s tired.