A Bit More Detail

Assorted Personal Notations, Essays, and Other Jottings

[LINK] “The French Disease, the Italian Disease, the Christian Disease–the New World Disease?”

The Loom’s Carl Zimmer writes about the origins of syphillis. Now a STD that’s readily treatable with antibiotics, back when syphillis first appeared in the Old World in the 1490s syphillis was as quickly lethal–and gruesome–a killer as HIV and still more rapid. The sudden appearance of the bacterial illness so soon after the return of Columbus’ return from the New World left many observers linking the disease with the newly-discovered continents. Were they right to do so? The evidence does seem to be leaning that way.

[S]cientists were split between two explanations for sudden appearance of syphilis at the end of the fifteenth century. According to one, it was caused by bacteria that had evolved in the New World and were brought back to Europe by Columbus’s crew. But other researchers found many skeletons with signs of syphilis in Europe, Africa, and Asia that appeared to have been from long before Columbus’s voyage. They argued that it must have started in the Old World, perhaps before people even left for the New World some 15,000 years ago.

As I explained in the article, one way to test these hypotheses is to survey the evolution of the bacteria. A group of researchers based at Emory University came across bacteria infecting Indians in Guyana that was genetically close, but not identical, to syphilis. They suggested syphilis had evolved in the New World from a common ancestor of both pathogens. Columbus’s crew may have picked it up when they visited the New World and then brought it home to Europe. Unfortunately, by the time doctors had gotten the bacteria from the jungles of Guyana to a laboratory where it could be analyzed, the DNA was in bad shape, so they couldn’t come to a firm conclusion.

Recently, I caught up with one of the scientists on the team, Kristin Harper, who is now at Columbia University. She didn’t have any new genetic results to talk about, unfortunately, although she may before long. In the meantime, she pointed me to a new review she has published in the Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. She and her colleagues took a look at the bones that scientists have pointed to as evidence for the antiquity of syphilis in both the New and Old World, and passed judgment about just how good the evidence was that they did, indeed, have syphilis, and not some other disease that can deform bone. The scientists also took a close look at the dating of the bones, since the timing of syphilis’s origin is so crucial to the entire debate.

The trouble with a lot of past research, Harper says, is that scientists have come up with new ways to diagnose syphilis in ancient bones without offering good evidence that their criteria are good. “Paleopathology is kind of the wild west of science, in that the ‘rules’ are still in their infancy,” Harper said. “We set ourselves the challenge of using only evidence-based diagnostic criteria in this paper and tried to be similarly stringent about dating.”

The scientists looked at 54 reports from both hemispheres. Most of the Old World bones failed to meet at least one of the standard requirements for a diagnosis of syphilis, such as distinctive pits on the skull or swelling in the long bones of the arms and legs. But when they looked at the Old World bones that had been dated to before 1492 that did make the grade, they ended up throwing all of those bones out, too. The evidence that these Old World bones were from before 1492 turned out to be weak. They tended to come from coastal regions, where people eat lots of fish. Fish are full of carbon from deep in the ocean, which has a different balance of isotopes than that found on the land. The ocean carbon gets into the bones of coastal people, where it can throw off estimates of their age by centuries. A close examination of these coastal Old World bones led the Emory scientists to conclude that they belonged to Europeans who died shortly after Columbus’s voyage.

“In contrast,” Harper told me, “we found definite cases of treponemal disease [syphilis] hailing from the New World that stretched back thousands and thousands of years.”

Zimmer concludes his post by noting that if Harper’s findings are accurate, syphillis is the one major disease that passed from the New World to the Old World in the post-Columbian exchanges. If the disease is from the New World by origin, then given the timing it likely is associated with Columbus’ expeditions–as noted in the comments, if syphillis had come via the Vikings’ adventures in Vinland there presumably would have been skeletal evidence in Norden. The speed with which it spread is unsettling: less than two years between Columbus’ return and the devastation of an entire French army in Italy by the disease. (And how much other death went undocumented?)


Written by Randy McDonald

December 21, 2011 at 1:56 am

Posted in History, Science

Tagged with , , ,

%d bloggers like this: