Posts Tagged ‘europe’
[AH] Five #alternatehistory maps from r/imaginarymaps: Balkans, Ethiopia, Europe, Australia, Bengal
- This r/imaginarymaps map imagines a Balkans where Muslims remain in larger numbers throughout the peninsula, leading to border changes in the south, particularly.
- An Ethiopia that has conquered most of the Horn of Africa by the mid-19th century, even going into Yemen, is the subject of this r/imaginarymaps map. Could this ever have happened?
- This r/imaginarymaps map imagines, here, a unified European Confederation descending from a conquest of Europe by Napoleon. Would this have been stable, I wonder?
- Was the unification of Australia inevitable, or, as this r/imaginarymaps post suggests, was a failure to unify or even a later split imaginable?
- Was a unified and independent Bengal possible, something like what this r/imaginarymaps post depicts?
[AH] What if a united Europe in the early 20th century? (#alternatehistory)
The first sentence of a recent tweet made me wonder about Donald Trump as a source of alternate histories–real alternate histories, of course, uchronias.
The idea of a European Military didn’t work out too well in W.W. I or 2. But the U.S. was there for you, and always will be. All we ask is that you pay your fair share of NATO. Germany is paying 1% while the U.S. pays 4.3% of a much larger GDP – to protect Europe. Fairness!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 8, 2018
The idea of a European Military didn’t work out too well in W.W. I or 2. But the U.S. was there for you, and always will be. All we ask is that you pay your fair share of NATO. Germany is paying 1% while the U.S. pays 4.3% of a much larger GDP – to protect Europe. Fairness!
The problem with this first sentence is that there was no “European Military” in the First or Second World Wars for the simple reason that the two world wars were fought between different European Great Powers. There was nothing at all like the contemporary European Union, certainly no Franco-German alliance like the one that exists now. Had there been such a supranational union of European states before the First World War, these two world wars would never have come about at all.
All that said, what if there was? The prehistory of the modern European Union and European integration generally extends far before 1945, with many liberals and radicals in 19th century Europe seeing a reorganization of the European continent into a federation of free nation-states the only way for the continent to move forward. I can just barely imagine someone like Napoleon III, acting in a somewhat different international environment (supporting liberal German nationalism against Prussia and Austria, perhaps?), favouring something like this.
Was an earlier European integration possible, perhaps organized around a Franco-German core as OTL? Could there have been, by a 1914, something like a European military? It goes without saying that the consequences of this would be enormous, for Europe and for non-Europe both. Was the non-European world was lucky to have Europe not united but tearing itself apart, for instance, to not have a Europe internally united and presented a single face to the outside world? Could an integrated Europe have kept pace with the emerging United States across the Atlantic, not falling prey to economic divisions which surely hindered European growth?
What do you think?
[LINK] On a possible replacement of Europe’s ancient population of homo sapiens
The Dragon’s Tales linked to the Cell paper “Pleistocene Mitochondrial Genomes Suggest a Single Major Dispersal of Non-Africans and a Late Glacial Population Turnover in Europe”. The abstract is eye-catching.
How modern humans dispersed into Eurasia and Australasia, including the number of separate expansions and their timings, is highly debated. Two categories of models are proposed for the dispersal of non-Africans: (1) single dispersal, i.e., a single major diffusion of modern humans across Eurasia and Australasia; and (2) multiple dispersal, i.e., additional earlier population expansions that may have contributed to the genetic diversity of some present-day humans outside of Africa. Many variants of these models focus largely on Asia and Australasia, neglecting human dispersal into Europe, thus explaining only a subset of the entire colonization process outside of Africa. The genetic diversity of the first modern humans who spread into Europe during the Late Pleistocene and the impact of subsequent climatic events on their demography are largely unknown. Here we analyze 55 complete human mitochondrial genomes (mtDNAs) of hunter-gatherers spanning ∼35,000 years of European prehistory. We unexpectedly find mtDNA lineage M in individuals prior to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). This lineage is absent in contemporary Europeans, although it is found at high frequency in modern Asians, Australasians, and Native Americans. Dating the most recent common ancestor of each of the modern non-African mtDNA clades reveals their single, late, and rapid dispersal less than 55,000 years ago. Demographic modeling not only indicates an LGM genetic bottleneck, but also provides surprising evidence of a major population turnover in Europe around 14,500 years ago during the Late Glacial, a period of climatic instability at the end of the Pleistocene.