Posts Tagged ‘star wars’
[NEWS] Five science fiction links: Catherynne Valente, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Janelle Monáe, numbers
- Lawyers, Guns and Money recently took a look at the way the great author Catherynne M. Valente made use of culture as a force in her briliant Space Opera.
- I quite enjoyed this oral history of Babylon 5, over at Syfy.
- MEL Magazine hosts this great article arguing the strength of The Last Jedi is that it does not give in to the wishes of fans.
- Vox’s exploration of the Afrofuturism of Janelle Monáe’s work really laid out these influences on her for me.
- James Nicoll recently asked an interesting question at Tor: Where is all the science fiction dealing with depopulation, with population decline?
[BRIEF NOTE] On the life and death of expanded universes, in Star Trek and Star Wars
Earlier this month, someone on Quora asked a question about Star Wars‘ Expanded Universe, the collection of books, comics and games that have been made officially out of date by the new movies.
How do I get over the fact that the Star Wars “Expanded Universe” is no longer canon?
I tried to like the new canon. I really did. I watched “The Force Awakens”, and while it wasn’t bad, it really bothered me that it didn’t follow the Star Wars Expanded Universe (EU). I grew up on the EU–through most of my childhood it was my life. Now it’s just causing me anxiety. What now?</blockquote<
I address this issue back in June, in connection to this expanded universe’s Star Trek equivalent. Writing an answer made sense to me.
* * *
I’m familiar with this sort of issue through my participation in the fandom of Star Trek, specifically the novels and other secondary material.
To date, there have been two separate canons of Star Trek tie-in material. The first materialized in the 1980s, alongside the movies but at a time when there was very little new material coming out. To make up for this, the authors of the authorized tie-in novels published by Pocket Books ended up creating a loose but real continuity, one which went into much greater detail about the universe of the 23rd century. Some authors took a deeper look at the Federation and its different worlds and their histories, for instance. Others took a look at other civilizations: Diane Duane’s Rihannsu series, taking an in-depth look at the Romulans, was acclaimed. This continuity spread beyond the novels, overlapping substantially with the setting of FASA’s Star Trek: The Role Playing Game..
This all changed. In large part this was because Star Trek: The Next Generation came out, hugely expanding the televisual canon. Roddenberry and the other owners of Star Trek intellectual property saw no particular need to incorporate the derivative tie-in material. This was particularly the case when they had objections to the content of much of the material–Roddenberry was taken aback by much of the alleged militarism of the roleplaying game, for instance. The end result was a shift from the late 1980s on, particularly under the stewardship of Richard Arnold, towards the production of tie-in material that not only had no connection to the loose canon of the 1980s but had no connection to each other. All fans got were disconnected stories, nothing with lasting consequence.
This began to change from the mid-1990s on. As television production on the different series began to wind down, different editors and writers at Pocket Books began to assemble a new continuity. From my perspective, much of this seems to do with crossover events. After the end of Deep Space Nine, the 2000 creation of the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine relaunch series led to a massive surge in the creation of a new novelverse canon, a veritable expanded universe. This has lasted to the present day, and has enabled what I think is a veritable surge of creativity. In this new novelverse canon, things happen which have lasting consequences: People die, people get together, civilizations end or are transformed. There is a sense of dynamic progress that in many cases we did not get on the television show. It’s great!
Of course, this is all fragile. The novelverse might be popular and even very good, but in Trek canon the novels rate as nothing next to the television shows. The 24th century might be safe from new television shows which would challenge the existing novelverse canon, or it might not. Perhaps more seriously, the current focus on the alternate 23rd century continuity created in the new movies could lead to radical shifts, whether by contradicting the continuity of the current universe or by leading to an end to the current production. Maybe future generations of show-runners will prefer that tie-in material only be produced to the continuity being worked by television? The expanded universe that I’ve been actively consuming for a decade can come to an end so easily.
How do I deal with this looming possibility? I would prefer that the fictional universes I consume last indefinitely, that they continue to develop, but this is simply beyond my control. Last year’s article at TheForce.net, “Anger Leads to Hate: Inside The Movement To Save The Expanded Universe”, made the point that no amount of reaction from the fans was likely to save *Star Wars*’ original expanded universe. There is simply much more money, and much more market, to be found in the creation of new material, on film and on television. The economics are the same for *Star Trek*. Why should I get upset by something I cannot control? The answer is that I should not. What would be the point?
Even if the current continuity did end, that by no means requires me to stop liking the material that has come out. Vonda N. MacIntyre’s 1981 The Entropy Effect was the first novel produced in the 1980s continuity I’d mentioned. Even though it belongs to that continuity only, never having been explicitly referenced in the television series or in any novel that I know of, The Entropy Effect is still an exciting and compelling story. Why would I not reread it? If the current Trek expanded universe met the same fate as its predecessor, the stories that were exciting and compelling to me before its end would remain as effective after its end. I cannot imagine that the Star Wars Legends books would be any different.
Finally, for people really upset that the expanded universe of old is gone, they might want to keep an eye out for elements of the expanded universe which make it into the current continuity. The season one TNG episode “Where No One Has Gone Before”, co-authored by the aforementioned Duane, is substantially based on her earlier novel The Wounded Sky, while the creation of the Klingons as a species of warriors capable of great honour seems to owe much to the novels. Some stories and story elements from the previous novel continuity have likewise made it into the present. Despite significant differences in the description of the Romulans, for instance, the culture and history of Duane’s Rihannsu continues to be the culture of the Romulans in the contemporary novelverse. On a more abstract level, Kurtzman and Orci have explicitly acknowledged their influences from various Trek novels, influences which create an atmosphere common to these novels and their movies. Katharine Trendacosta’s io9 article “What The Force Awakens Borrowed From the Old Star Wars Expanded Universe” suggests that the Expanded Universe of old may have been a substantial influence, as was in fact implied by Disney when the announcement was made. What’s wrong with seeing the better concepts you liked on the big and small screens in recognizable form?
TLDR: Just try to keep in mind that we read these tie-in stories for fun, like we do any stories. Whether or not the particular universe they exist in continues or not is fundamentally irrelevant to their enjoyability.