Archive for May 2007
This evening, I returned to Toronto with Jerry from our one-year anniversary trip, a visit to Niagara Falls, Ontario over the Victoria Day long weekend just concluded. A more extensive post will follow, but for the moment (i.e. until I get the pictures), I’ll just say that Niagara is a place of very scenic extremes and leave it there.
Serbia should quit striving for closer ties with the West and turn to Russia, the newly elected, right-wing parliament speaker said, while feuding pro-democracy parties remained unable to forge a coalition government.
Tomislav Nikolic, a leader of the ultranationalist Serb Radical Party and an admirer of late President Slobodan Milosevic, chaired the assembly on Tuesday after clinching the key post of Speaker during a tense overnight session that fully exposed deep divisions among Serbia’s pro-democracy groups.
“Russia will find a way to bring together nations that will stand up against the hegemony of America and of the European Union,” Nikolic told the 250-seat parliament. “I hope that a majority in Serbia will strive for membership in such an organization, not in the European Union.”
His remarks reflected a rising anti-Western sentiment here, fueled by Brussels’ decision last year to suspend pre-entry talks with Serbia over its failure to capture a war crimes suspect. Furthermore, many Serbs feel disappointed by Washington’s support for independence of Kosovo, a breakaway province in Serbia’s south.
The Serbian Radical Party was founded in 1991 by nationalist politician Vojislav Seselj. At present, Seselj is on trial in The Hague for crimes against humanity associated with his leadership of the White Eagles paramilitary group, before that having come to international attention through the threateningly colourful rhetoric that he directed towards non-Serbs.
The prosecutor also replayed clips of speeches he had made, in which Seselj had recommended the “amputation” of Croatia, warned that Yugoslavia would soon become “Serboslavia” and stated that Bosnian Muslims who weren’t prepared to show loyalty to a Serb state should “start packing”.
But Seselj denied that he had been seeking to stir Serbs into a frenzy of hatred, or that he had hoped to instil fear in other ethnic groups. Instead, he argued, he’d simply been warning both Serbs and non-Serbs alike about potential dangers they faced.
Another example was the notorious statement he made when war broke out between Serbs and Croats. Seselj supposedly said, “We will gouge the Croats eyes out with rusty forks and spoons.” He told the tribunal this comment was part of the “black humour” he so enjoys.
Nikolic’s appointment has already complicated Serbia’s international role, by making the worthiness of Serbia to hold the rotating presidency of the Council of Europe quite open to question. As for Serbia’s prospects of membership in the European Union, it’s tempting to claim that Nikolic’s selection will only make an unlikely event somewhat more unlikely, since the Europeanization of western Balkans seems to have come to a halt in the face of western European reluctance to further expand the Union. The baleful effects of this institutional cementing of ultranationalism on Serbia itself, alas, seem likely to pass without much notice.
Below is the conclusion of Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Los Angeles Times commentary “Can secular Turkey survive democracy?”.
An important trait of liberalism, however, is the opportunity to learn by trial and error. Turkish secular liberals must start their own grass-roots movement, one with the message of individual freedom. They must restore the confidence of the electorate in entrusting Turkey’s economy to them, and they must reconquer the institutions of education, information, police and justice.
They must also make EU leaders understand and respect the fact that the army and the Constitutional Court — besides defending the country and the constitution — are also, and maybe even more important, designed to protect Turkish democracy from Islam.
Bringing back true secularism does not mean just any secularism. It means secularism that protects individual freedoms and rights, not the ultra-nationalist kind that breeds an environment in which Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” is a bestseller, the Armenian genocide is denied and minorities are persecuted. Hrant Dink, the Armenian editor, was murdered by such a nationalist.
It is this mix of virulent nationalism and predatory Islam in Turkey that makes the challenge for Turkish secular liberals greater than for any other liberal movement today.
1. Any country where the rule of law can be maintained only through the machinations of a deep state that controls the secret services and the military likely should abandon all hope as to the possibility of European Union membership. Neither Francoist Spain nor Titoist Yugoslavia recommended themselves as EEC candidates–why should Kemalist Turkey be different?
2. The assassination of Hrant Dink that refers to was carried out by a teenager who seems to have been motivated by a nationalist that combined Islamic fundamentalism with secular Turkish nationalism. Countries tend not to move beyond murderous narrow-mindedness if one gives the ideologies that undergird this narrow-mindedness control over society in general.
And, of course, my Dread Lord fluffcthulhu.
It’s always sort of enraging when some knitting genius — toiling away solely in aim of their own amusement — crochets a work of stark sub-culture genius, promotes it on the Internet, then shrugs modestly and announces they don’t have a pattern.
This seems to happen especially often with knit Cthulhu projects, like this crocheted Cthulhu Bunny.
Yesterday in the Toronto Star, Chantal Hébert’s article “Ahead of Scotland on issue of sovereignty” was one article of many examining the similarities between Québécois and Scottish separatism. After pointing out that independence isn’t an inevitable outcome of either movement, Hébert points out that Chrétien’s decision to keep Canada out of Iraq was smart.
As for the Scotland result, if it fits anywhere in the Canadian puzzle, it is as a validation of Jean Chrétien’s decision to keep Canada out of the Iraq war rather than as a condemnation of policies designed to accommodate the autonomous aspirations of a national minority.
The Scotland vote is part of the larger pattern of a backlash against the Iraq fiasco and those such as Blair who played a leading role in bringing it about.
That pattern also includes last week’s faceoff between President George W. Bush and Congress.
The Iraq war has unleashed powerful domestic tensions within the countries that joined the coalition.
By staying out of it, Chrétien may have deprived the Quebec sovereignty movement of one of its last best opportunities to relaunch its crusade. By the same token, the Quebec-Canada dynamics have gone a long way to keep Canada out of a quagmire of historic proportions.
To this, one might add the case of Spain, where there were considerable tensions between the government of conservative Spanish Perime Minister José María Aznar that brought Spain into Iraq (against the support of ~90% of the population) and the autonomous regions of the Basque Country and Catalonia. Iraq and regional nationalisms intersected, in the Spanish case, in the decision of Aznar to blame the Basque group ETA for the 2004 Madrid train bombings even after it became apparent that ETA was not responsible, and in so doing try to settle domestic political scores.
pompe is the first person on my friends list to have linked to this BBC news item, a report on the opinions of British broadcaster and writer Sir Patrick Moore regarding the influence of women on British television.
[Moore] said: “The trouble is the BBC now is run by women and it shows soap operas, cooking, quizzes, kitchen-sink plays. You wouldn’t have had that in the golden days.”
“I would like to see two independent wavelengths – one controlled by women, and one for us, controlled by men.”
He claimed that interesting programmes were screened too late at night, and said he would “rather be dead in a ditch” than appear on Celebrity Big Brother. And asked about his favourite series, Sir Patrick said he no longer enjoyed certain programmes because of their modern storylines.
“I used to watch Doctor Who and Star Trek, but they went PC – making women commanders, that kind of thing. I stopped watching.”
Is it just me, or are some of the people who complain about the tyranny of political correctness just jackasses?